If Richmond's Department of Community Development is looking for a new (or old) way to get groups of people seriously engaged in the future of the city, they could do worse than ratchet up the work of their Neighborhood Planning staff -- or so suggests the latest from World Changing.
The thought-provoking weblog delves into the neighborhood as a powerful tool of social improvement, pointing readers to a Streets Wiki post on neighborhoods and block parties:
Which begs the question, how do communities overcome the barriers to building neighbor to neighbor relationships? The neighborhood block, defined as the dwellings fronting on a single street between two cross streets, serves as a reasonable point of entry for health promoters for a number of reasons. A few of the reasons are identified by Douglas Perkins, a leading researcher in social capital and community development. First, the processes of informal control which empowers people operate more successfully in the face to face setting of the neighborhood block than in larger social units. Second, blocks are more homogenous and people are more likely to share similar concerns. And third, participation rates at the block level are found to be higher than at any other level.
Public spaces such as the street block remains understudied and underutilized in the effort to increase social capital. For decades, street blocks in cities such as Philadelphia have hosted a number of block parties and it can reasonably be argued that these annual or frequent social gatherings foster the ties necessary for a vibrant community life...
This comes (give or take two years) on the heels of a previous World Changing post about block parties and the future of hyperlocal urbanism.
That, naturally, got me to thinking about Richmond's community weblogs -- the dozen or so hyperlocal news sites focusing on specific areas of the city (like Church Hill, Northside or Short Pump) -- and the Department of Community Development. Okay, strike Short Pump (insofar as Richmond's community development department is concerned).
What if the community blogs partnered with the city, neighborhood associations and local merchants to organize block parties in the communities they serve? Or, reinforce existing block parties in areas where they've already taken root?
In addition to food and fun, the bolstered block parties could include meaningful space for representatives of key city departments to connect to, answer questions for and build relationships with citizens at a street level. There could be information booths, small focus group discussions about neighborhood improvement and opportunities to collaboratively identify new initiatives for neighborhood improvement or engagement.
Done well, it could lay the groundwork for the development of a citywide master planning process, something that has been on the periphery of the table ever since the city initiated its Downtown Master Plan process in 2007. Get neighborhoods engaged, generate ideas at a ground level, resolve issues at the street level -- and then invite everyone who turns out to a massive citywide charrette at the Arthur Ashe Center.
Now that would be community engagement on steroids.
Posted by: Amanda Robinson | August 24, 2009 at 20:28
Posted by: Scott Burger | August 24, 2009 at 20:44
Posted by: John Sarvay | August 24, 2009 at 20:47
Posted by: Paul | August 25, 2009 at 12:25
Posted by: John Sarvay | August 25, 2009 at 19:41
Posted by: Paul | August 25, 2009 at 21:51