There was some great news writing in the Richmond region in 2007, and while it was not a banner year for Richmond's news media it was much better than expected. Forgive my bias toward print media -- no one really watches television for news anymore, and Richmond radio (with one or two exceptions) is an auditory sieve. I wrote a bit about online media circa 2007 here. What follows is not so much a running list of great moments as it is my own observations of Richmond media, circa 2007.
Halfway Ain't No Way To Run A Paper: If you fired everyone at the Richmond Times-Dispatch and asked David Ress, Michael Martz, Carol Hazard and three or four others to step up their game, you'd have a pretty good newspaper. That's not entirely fair to the rest of the reporters who fill Richmond's daily newspaper with largely unremarkable copy every day of the week, but it's also not entirely fair to the 180,000 readers of the paper that what could be the region's most influential voice takes all of five minutes to read each morning. The website continues to sink under the weight of its own poor design. The multimedia coverage is hard to find, impossible to share and not intuitively connected to the primary product -- the newspaper. I remain perplexed by the TD's inability to consistently deliver. On the flipside, the paper's Public Square forums create the sort of conversations you want to see in a community -- and provide parallel coverage that creates context for significant issues. Earlier in December, the paper announced that it was going to "own breaking news" in Richmond -- a relatively low bar for the only daily publication in town. I'd jump up and down with joy to have a daily newspaper that did a better job of just owning the regular news. It is critical for the Richmond region to have a daily newspaper that is undeniably essential reading.
When Glossy Can't Erase Edgy: It's hip to be square, or rectangular. RVA Magazine delivers more of a graphic look than a solid editorial voice, but the monthly has an energy and a focus that you don't find all that often in Richmond. Behind its colorific design and art/music-heavy coverage, RVA Magazine is really about having a party. How else to explain the half-dozen or so events the magazine has tossed into the community? Events like the jam-packed Action Patrol reunion show or the explosive New Year's Eve party in Carytown. In recent months, RVA Magazine has started running more community oriented articles (Disclaimer: I've penned a half dozen pieces for RVA Mag on the Downtown Plan and Crupi Reports) and the glossy monthly just expanded its print run to 5,000 and can be found at more locations around town. If the publication can strengthen its voice on paper and continue to expand its presence on the streets, it might just show the rest of the pack how to run a publication. (P.S. Their website is also nominal.)
Either I'm Getting Older, Or They're Getting Hip: At some point in the past several years, Richmond magazine has become interesting. I've always wanted it to be interesting, so maybe -- like always wanting a puppy of my own -- I've simply convinced myself its interesting. Maybe I'm just getting older and my standards are slipping. Maybe the writing and editorial team is getting better. It's hard to tell. Whatever the cause, Richmond Magazine in the past year or so has become a lot more interesting to read. It's more relevant. It digs deeper. If they'd kill their Bride and Home and ad-centric neighborhood inserts and folded the content into the regular magazine, I'd like it even more. The monthly magazine may never set my world on fire, but there is a simmer in my relationship with Richmond magazine that feels new. (Here's a familiar note: The website sucks. Hey, Richmond magazine, free your content!) (Another disclaimer: My wife infrequently puts food on our table by writing for Richmond magazine.)
25 Years and Still In the Running: Style Weekly's geographic emphasis -- essentially, Style feels contained by the James River and Broad Street, and by Church Hill and Three Chopt -- is its strength and its weakness. For a publication that leaned heavily on its lifestyle reputation for years, Style's news coverage in 2007 was what set it apart both from its reputation and from the rest of the media. Chris Dovi's aggressive coverage of the Wilder administration and the Richmond School Board has been exceptional, while Scott Bass and Amy Biegelsen keep the news package pretty consistently solid. Deveron Timberlake and her team of foodies not only provide great reviews, they also "own breaking food news" in Richmond. It's possible that I have a real problem with companion publications, but I'd love to see Style fold the content from its Homestyle and Belle publications into its regular weekly. Style's website is easy to navigate and free to peruse -- both big wins.
Internet Killed the Video Star: I can't even begin to provide perspective on local television news, even uninformed perspective. Is local television news even relevant anymore? Should it be? It hurts my head even to think about what a nightmare it would be trying to make television news a viable business model, much less a compelling force in our community.
Sink Like A Brick: There's an idea for Media General that would have saved a lot of money and a little heartache. Rather than publishing a independent weekly that tries to live on the edge, simply add an edgier writer to the Times-Dispatch's weekly Weekend package, print it on better paper and distribute extra copies free. Brick Weekly under Pete Humes was a bad idea that many who knew Pete wanted to work. Brick Weekly without Pete remains a bad idea.
Recent Comments