The Downtown Plan: The Future of West Hospital
Urban Richmond takes umbrage at the Times-Dispatch editorial team's recent offerings about the future of VCU's West Hospital (No, no, the early offerings -- way back on February 22.).
I am one of those who will protest their characterization of preservationists having badly skewed values.
My question is, when did we accept VCU’s proposition, without challenge, that they have only two options: keep using an outdated ineffective hospital building or tear it down.
Why not sell the building and use the proceeds to build a new hospital nearby?
There’s plenty of vacant land around MCV- currently used as surface parking lots (View Map of Broad & 14th area).
I absolutely agree that MCV should build a new hospital building- I just don’t buy the dichotomy we’re being sold: tear it down or fail the patients.
There may, of course, be good reasons that MCV cannot acquire the vacant land near them- but that their spokespeople (and the TD) never mention it as an option while harshly criticizing their opponents suggests they are bent on pursuing their own agenda.
Posted by:John | February 28, 2008 at 19:31
Posted by:WHworker | February 28, 2008 at 12:13